A place for casual sports fans who believe that their opinion is just as blog-worthy as the so called experts. Inspired by Tony Kernheiser, Woody Paige, and others who primarily analyze and make commentary on contemporary sports as opposed to doing actual reporting and investigatory work. Also inspired by Bill Simmons and Mike Wilbon who have demonstrated that sports writers can openly have biases.
Monday, October 11, 2010
5 football thoughts
To be bowl eligible a team has to win 50% of its games. BYU has already lost 4 games. Assuming they lose to TCU (4th) and Utah (11th) they would have to win every other game this season. However, the rest of the schedule is not exactly daunting: Wyoming (2-4), UNLV (1-5), CSU (1-5), and New Mexico (0-6). Assuming BYU makes and plays in a bowl game they would likely play some small team from a weak conference... BYU could have a 7 win season.
2. A BCS disaster would be better than a national championship
BSU, TCU, OSU, Oregon, LSU, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Missouri, Oklahoma State, Michigan State, Utah, Auburn, and Nevada are all currently undefeated. I don’t see anyone knocking off BSU, TCU, OSU, or Oregon. Throw in an undefeated Big 12 team, and a 0 or 1 loss SEC team and we could have 6 teams, all of which could legitimately claim they have the right to play for a national title.
Now imagine this possible scenario. BSU, TCU, OSU, Oregon, Nebraska, and MSU, all finish undefeated. Oklahoma’s only loss is in the Big 12 championship game to Nebraska, and LSU’s only loss is to Alabama who wins the SEC. Because the ACC and the Big East get automatic bids. 2 teams out of from BSU (#3), TCU (#4), or MSU (#13) Oklahoma(#6) or LSU (#9) would not get to play in a BCS Bowl game while the big east champion west Virginia (#25) and the ACC champion FSU (#16) do.
Two or more teams are going to get hosed. The more people who are angry at the current system the better shot we have at getting som sort of playoff. Whereas if BSU plays in the national championship the BCS lovers are going to claim that the system works. Worse still, if BSU loses to a good Ohio St. team the BCS lovers are going to say that no mid-major deserves to play for a national championship again.
3. The NFC West quarterbacks are awful
This morning I was calling for Alex Smith’s head on Mike Sando’s (an ESPN blogger) Facebook page when an Arizona fan teased me about wanting to get a new QB. My immediate response was to bash Max Hall, and that’s when I realized how bad the QBs in the entire division are.
Name/QB Rating/TDs/INTs
Smith / 71.6 / 6 / 9
Hasselback / 70.7 / 4 / 6
Bradford / 66.5 / 6 / 8
Hall / 60.5 / 0 / 2
To provide some context, amongst starting quarterbacks only Jimmy Clausen, Brett Favre, and Bruce Gradkowski, have worse QB ratings than the highest rated NFC west QB.
4. Max Hall is a winner
I have never liked Max Hall. His arm is weak and everyone I know who has met him as left with a bad taste in their mouth. But you have to give credit where credit is due. Not only did Max Hall become BYU’s all-time winningnest quarterback, but in his first NFL start he beat the defending Super Bowl champions.
5. The 49ers suck but will finish the season better than the Broncos
The 49ers are bad. They are 0-5. However, they have lost 3 out of their 5 games during the last minute to playoff caliber teams. Their remaining schedule is fairly easy. They can still win 6 to 8 games this year.
The Broncos are also bad. They are 2-3. Their remaining schedule is tougher. They will win 4-5 more games this year. Thus, I reason if the 49ers beat the Broncos during week 8, the 49ers will finish the season with a better record.
Perhaps I’m delusional. However, every Bronco fan I have ever met believes they will win the Super Bowl every year...I'm in good company.
Saturday, July 31, 2010
Getting Back Up
Remember this?
In 2007 Jake Brown in his final run lost control of his board and fell 45 feet. He hit the ground so hard that his shoes flew off his feet. The impact knocked him unconscious. ESPN commentators stated it was the worst fall they had ever seen.
Jake Brown was 32 years old when he fell. He had never won an X-games gold medal. No one would blame him if he didn't want to continue.
Despite the epic fall, Jake did come back. He won his first gold in 2009.
And then won again last night.
This is why I love sports. It may not be of any lasting importance, but watching stand back up after being beaten down is inspirational. And in our world where forces seem to be conspiring against us to beat us down, we all need a little inspiration.
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
BYU Sporting Fix.
ESPN Blogger James Walker predicts that John Beck has about a 60% chance of getting cut by the Ravens. http://espn.go.com/blog/afcnorth/post/_/id/14800/afc-north-roster-bubbles
KSL.com has a nice interview piece with John Beck. http://www.ksl.com/?nid=294&sid=11552470
ESPN NFL analyst Len Pasquerelli thinks that Harvey Unga will be the top player taken in Thursday’s supplemental draft. However, Pasquerelli notes that most players taken in the S-draft do poorly. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=pasquarelli_len&id=5375548
MWC.com reports that Jimmer Fredette was one of 20 athletes to be chosen to play on Team USA’s practice squad. http://www.themwc.com/sports/m-baskbl/spec-rel/070910aae.html
Ryan Mink has a great piece on TE Dennis Pitta’s journey from a BYU walk-on to the NFL. http://www.baltimoreravens.com/News/Articles/2010/05/From_Unknown_To_Unmatched.aspx
The Salt Lake Tribune reports on BYU’s hiring of Mike Hall as head of BYU’s basketball operations. http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/sports/49916180-77/hall-byu-basketball-mike.html.csp
Talo Steves of TrueBlueSports.com details BYU’s efforts to sign 275 pound high school junior Hiva Lutui. http://byu.scout.com/2/983705.html
The Daily Herald has a piece on BYU basketball’s national championship team. http://heraldextra.com/sports/article_20ecaa16-9bcb-5d6b-9527-c8fbeb690c7d.html
BYU’s official site released next year’s basketball roster and breaks down each position. http://www.byucougars.com/Filing.jsp?ID=14159
Blue Ribbon predicts that BYU football will wind up with an 9-3 record and a shot to get 10 wins in a bowl game. http://insider.espn.go.com/ncf/insider/news/story?id=5358109
Monday, July 12, 2010
5 Winners and Losers of the Summer of LeBron
Winners
D-Wade – Perhaps nobody came out of this mess better than D-Wade. Miami is and will forever be Wade town. Any success the trio has will fall upon him. In many ways this situation is eerily similar to the New York Yankees. A-Rod is the best player but when you think Yankees you think of Jeter. James is going to have a hard time establishing himself as the greatest player of all time living under Wade’s shadow.
Stephen A. Smith – Smith comes out of this ordeal golden. He correctly predicted where the King would land and got a lot of publicity in the process. The last few days before “The Decision” you couldn’t avoid him if you wanted to.
Dan Gilbert – It would be easy to criticize the Cavs owner. If he could have held on to Boozer years ago then LeBron would already have 2 rings. If he would have dealt Shaq’s contract sooner the Cavs may have kept LeBron. If he would have been building for the future, such as the Thunder have done, he would have some pieces to rebuild with. Despite all of Dan Gilbert’s failures, he has successfully turned all the blame towards LeBron. By promising his fans that they will win a title before Miami he has transformed himself into the hero.
Twitter – Twitter established itself as the source for up to the date sports news. With Chris Bosh posted his every move there. Kevin Durant first announced his contract extension there. D-Wade continues to post his feelings there. Sports columnists were able to post their unsubstantiated theories there. It was definitely a lot of good exposure for Twitter.
Players Union – In an economy where everyone is hurting, it was already going to be tough for the owners to explain how their businesses were still turning a profit. Through in the teams’ willingness to throw max deals at Joe Johnson, Amare, and the likes and it is going to be near impossible for them to argue they don’t have the money to raise player salaries.
Losers
King James’s brand – LeBron has been blasted repeatedly by just about every major news agency. Even David Stern has come out and said that LeBron’s actions were “ill-advised.” The King went from universally loved to universally hated in an 1 hour segment.
Atlanta Hawks – How in the world did Joe Johnson end up with the biggest payday this off-season? He might not even be the best player on his own team. This contract will haunt the Hawks for a long time.
Jordan Farmar – When Farmer said that he was going to leave the Lakers he had a perfectly legitimate reason: he wanted to be a starter. Can you explain why then he signed with the Nets? Last time I checked Devin Harris is pretty darned good and isn’t about to retire any time soon.
Utah Jazz – My heart breaks for the Jazz perhaps more than any other team. They lost both Boozer and Korver to the Chicago Bulls. If the Bulls win with a great point guard and those two it may be too much for Jazz fans to handle. Throw in that the Jazz may still lose Mathews and it is a bleak time to be a Jazz fan.
Small market teams – The days when teams picked their players may be limited. Superstars teaming up together may become the new norm. Already there are talks of Chris Paul teaming up with Carmelo and Amare in New York next season. If this does become the new reality it is going to be increasingly more difficult for smaller markets to attract the stars.
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Draft Strategy
Disclaimer
I feel that I should begin this article with a disclaimer. Fantasy football is about having fun. The best teams often lose and people often win with strategies based off which player they like most. I personally have had Wes Welker in every league for years simply because he is my favorite player in the NFL. That being said, it is fun to win, and there is a better way to draft than filling your starting spots one by one.
Why do RBs Go off the Board so Early?
Ever wonder why running backs always go off the board first? After all in 2009 nine out of the top ten highest scoring players were quarterbacks. Similarly why do kickers go so late? Last year, Nate Keading outscored such notable players as Marcus Colston, Chad Ochocinco, and LaDainian Tomilson. The answer lies in how deep each position is in a given year. More specifically the point differential between the players within each position.
Running backs go off the board first because there are so few elite backs. Think about it. About half the teams suck at running (ex. the Colts), another third of the teams use several running backs (ex. the Cowboys.) That leaves only a small group of running backs who are capable of putting up a lot of points. Eliminate the injury prone players (ex. Larry Johnson) and there are only a handful of elite running backs.
Calculating the Point Differential
The key to drafting is figuring out how big the drop off is between any given player and the best player of that position that will still be available if you waited a round or two.
Allow me to drive this point home with an example. You have the very first pick in your ten man league. You have decided to spend your pick on the player who is projected to score more points than anyone else, Drew Brees. You then spend the next three rounds picking up a RB and two WRs. At the beginning of the fifth round you realize that you need your second RB so you pick up the best one available, Felix Jones. ESPN projects that the Brees / Jones combo will award you 470 points. Now, if instead you drafted Chris Johnson first overall and waited to pick up an average QB like Tony Romo at the start of the fifth, you would earn 550 points. Thus, even though Brees stands to earn more points than Johnson, Johnson is the better pick.
Now don’t assume what I have said means that you want to pick running backs over any other position. Once you get past those elite running backs things start to even out. For instance, if in our hypothetical we are now picking in the third and seventh rounds and we still need a RB and a QB, it now behooves you to pick the QB first. The best running back you will get in the third is Shone Greene and the best quarterback you will get in the seventh is Matt Ryan. That combo will earn you 391. Conversely, in the third you could still get Tom Brady, and Brandon Jacobs will still be around in the seventh. The Brady / Jacobs combo is worth 438 points.
Watch Out for the Runs
In an ideal world, you could sit down calculate out the drop off between each player and calculate out the perfect draft. But things don’t work out that way.
Let’s say according to your math and ESPN’s projections the best plan of action is to draft a RB in the first round, a WR in the second, a QB in the third, a RB in the fourth, a WR in the fifth, and a TE in the sixth. (I have no idea if this is really a sound strategy.) Things are going to plan until right before you pick in the fifth round someone picks up Dallas Clark and you feel that a run on the TEs is about to happen.
This puts you in a tricky situation. Sticking with your plan to draft a TE in the sixth would now be foolish. Antonio Gates will be gone and the difference between the third and the ninth TE is only 10 points. So you have to decide whether to grab Gates and his 26 point lead over the next best TE, or wait until the eleventh round when you can probably pick up a TE just as good as the one you would have gotten in the sixth.
A similar run could happen with the QBs, so be aware of where the drop off occurs. From the #1 QB to the #5 QB there is a 49 point drop off but from the #6 QB to the #10 QB there is only a 20 point drop off.
This is too complicated
Unless you are a mathematical wizard like Dave Barney or have way too much time on your hands, it is too much work to try and keep all the point differentials straight. There are just too many moving parts. That's alright. You don't need to know the actual point differentials, but be able to identify where the drop offs occur. Some people use a tiered system. For instance, Adrian Peterson, Chris Johnson, MJD, and Ray Rice are all tier 1 RBs and Benson, Greene and Grant are tier 3 RBs.
I prefer to ask myself, who will still be available if I waited a round to fill that position? Will there still be a good QB in the fourth round? It all boils down to this: the deeper the position is the more likely you can draft a quality player deeper in the draft.
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Fantasy Football Busts and Sleepers
Adam Tate – In 2007 he owned a team with Tom Brady, Wes Welker, LaDainian Tomilson, and Antonio Gates and still only placed third in his league.
Bust - Andre Johnson - Don't get me wrong Andre Johnson will still be good. However, I don't think he warrants being the number 1 receiver this year, and definitely don't think he worth the number 7 pick overall. I understand that he has had back to back great seasons. But the Texans have the toughest schedule in the league. There is a five game stretch where they have to play the Jets, Titans, Eagles, Ravens, Titans in consecutive weeks.
Sleeper - Eddie Royal - ESPN current projects Royal to be 163rd best player on the board. That means in a twelve man league he will be available in the 13th round. Granted last year wasn't the best, but a sophomore slump is not unheard of, and during his rookie year Royal pulled in 91 receptions for nearly 1000 yards.
Joe Kenny – In 2008 he played in three leagues including the Blitz League and took GOLD in all three leagues.
Bust – Lots of players are going to be busts this year: Mark Bulger, Jake Delhomme, Tim Hightower, Hester, Forte and DeSean Jackson (in no particular order).
Sleeper - Chad Henne – Henne has an arm plus he stands to gain with the addition of Brandon Marshall.
Kyle Kenny - Kyle Kenny is the commissioner of the Blitz fantasy football league. In five seasons, Kyle has reached the playoffs four times, with three top-three finishes (Gold in 2005). In all leagues played, Kyle has an overall record of 106-93.
Bust – Lesean McCoy - I was very unconvinced with his role spelling (and subsequently replacing) Brian Westbrook in the lineup. Mike Bell is coming off of a year in New Orleans in which he easily matched the numbers of incumbent starter Pierre Thomas (which were good numbers, mind you). While I won’t outright predict McCoy being supplanted as starter like I famously did two years ago with Kurt Warner and Matt Leinart, I do have my doubts that LeSean is the answer in Philadelphia.
Sleeper – Matt Ryan - Matt Ryan had a satisfactory 2009 season… without a fully functional offense at his disposal. I’m not a scout or an analyst, but such professionals have nothing but rave reviews of Matt Ryan’s development as an NFL quarterback. With two years of quarterbacking successful seasons under his belt, Roddy White and Tony Gonzalez on the other side of the ball, and a healthy Michael Turner, a breakout season is in the works that will push Matt Ryan’s value up to that of an upper tier quarterback.
Sleeper #2 – Chaz Schilens - Chaz Schilens was set to rise out of obscurity to emerge as the Raiders top nod option coming into the 2009 season when he suffered a broken foot, missing eight games, and returning to one of the worst merry-go-round situations at quarterback possible. While not completely safe to say Jason Campbell is the savior of Oakland, it is comforting to know the Raiders have a serviceable quarterback who posted decent numbers even under a terrible offensive line in Washington. To top that, Chaz’s athletic ability puts him at 6-foot-4, a 4.38 40 and incredible hands during training camp last year. Looking at ESPN’s board, I would be comfortable moving Chaz above several other receivers for the upcoming draft.
Mark Mills – Mark has played with various team names including: Salt Lake Slutzz, Crazy Crack Clowns, Dead Rabbits, and Apocalypse ponies.
Bust - Shonn Greene - I know he's on the Jets, but that doesn't mean he is a sure thing to run wild. I think he might do okay, but to say he is #12 with nothing really proven is too risky, and I can see a bust.
Sleeper - Kevin Kolb - The Eagles pass heavy offense is going to help Kolb rack up the fantasy points. The team obviously has extreme confidence in Kolb, so why should we think otherwise. Remember this is not a rookie on a bad team, this is a guy who has been under the system and learned the right way to lead the team. Does anyone remember Aaron Rodgers??
Matt Christensen – Matt has an overall record of 47-49. He placed second in multiple leagues in 2008.
Bust - Steven Jackson - The guy has been in the top projected rankings for a few years now, and I only remember him having one good season. The Rams are still not good enough to take the load off of him. Every team just stacks the line and plays against him.
Sleeper - Matthew Stafford - I liked how this kid held his own last year. And he had a few games when he did go off and have 3+ touchdowns. I still think that the Lions will have a semi-crappy year, but I think he will be more consistent in his scoring.
Side notes – Ryan Matherws is not a sleeper! In ESPN’s mock draft central he averaging 16th overall.
Friday, June 18, 2010
How I Learned to Love Ron Artest
In 2009 I hated the Houston Rockets. During the seven game series between the Lakers and the Rockets I even hated them more than the Boston Celtics, New York Yankees, and the SEC. Absolute disdain. I hated Shane Battier and his flawless defense. I hated Aaron Brooks every time he would fly by the slower Derek Fisher. I absolutely hated everything about Luis Scola - especially his greasy nasty hair. Perhaps most of all I hated Ron Artest. I hated him for the melee, I hated his toughness, I hated his outside shot, I hated him.
During the regular season Ron Ron stunk. His offensive numbers dropped dramatically: 17.1 ppg – 11.0 ppg; 5.2 rpg – 4.3 rpg; .748 ft% - .688 ft%; .399 3% - .3555. More disconcerting than Ron’s offensive struggles was the fact that he just didn’t seem as tough. He no longer imposed fear on those he guarded.
Monday, June 14, 2010
Texas staying put: What does this mean for the MWC?
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Big 12 Killers: It’s about more than football.
By Kyle Kenny
Being a Nebraska native, I’ve been watching a little closer than some the whole speculation of Nebraska moving to the Big 10 Conference. Now that move is official. Many have their heads scratching as to why they would move from a conference where they were relative big fish. There are several good reasons, the least having to do with football itself.
I. Show me the money. I am a fan of pro football. I have a lot of friends, however, that are strong proponents for college football. To these friends, they feel more team spirit prevalent and feel it is “less about the money, more about the spirit.” I have always disagreed with these arguments. Measuring team spirit of players and fans between any sport—college or pro—is impossibly subjective of an argument to consider. However, anyone who believes college sports isn’t about the money needs a serious reality check. The mere existence of the BCS is proof that money talks more than passion of the game. Also, while players themselves aren’t necessarily playing for money, some players are playing for the CHANCE to get big money on draft day. Some, as headlined in the news from time to time, DO receive money in the form of kickbacks while attending college. But I am digressing. The Big Ten offers something to Nebraska that the Big 12 couldn’t do during its entire existence: maximize cash flow to the School’s athletic program. I read a recent article that stated on average, the Big Ten schools received as much as $20 M per year from TV contract revenue via the Big Ten network. The Big 12, in comparison, only dished out $7-12 M, depending on the school. Fans nationwide will decry this as a “money grab.” But when you’re talking money in this proportion, it no longer becomes an athletics department issue, but rather a business issue for the school as a whole. This brings me to my next point.
II. Academics. Hopefully, college fans have not forgotten that the team in which they support is not an end in itself. Rather, it is merely an auxiliary to a much more important academic institution for higher learning and career development. Many fans are not aware that schools in the Big Ten are very much academically superior to schools in most other major conferences. While Nebraska is likely not currently on par in academic prestige as current Big Ten schools, the move will likely pressure Nebraska to make the changes to help it conform to the higher standards, and hence higher prestige. For the other several thousand attending, or planning to attend UNL that AREN’T part of any athletics program, dividends will be had in the form of a more relevant and prestigious degree.
III. Insurance. Nebraska knew that the conference was under attack, and with other power schools such as Texas and Oklahoma being targets of other major conferences, Nebraska didn’t want to be the odd man out. Nebraska insisted that it considered all alternatives, and decided the Big Ten invite was something they had wanted for years. Whether this be the real case or not, the application of game theory among the Big Twelve schools in my opinion had a definite role; in this instance of head games, Nebraska concluded that the other schools, despite their verbal stances, were already leaning on leaving. Whether or not that was truly the case will forever be open to speculation.
IV. Sports. Honestly, in my opinion, football (among other sports) itself was the least of the factors leading to the decision to move. I am likely wrong; however, in my defense, I would find difficulty accepting any argument that the Big Ten is far superior to the Big Twelve in strength of schedule, if at all superior. What this move does do is open doors to new regions/states/markets for recruiting purposes for all sports programs in Nebraska Athletics.
It will be intriguing to see the fallout of these conference decisions. Will Texas, Oklahoma, and co. move to the Pac-10? What other schools will the Pac-10 lure away if things don’t go as planned? Will MWC successfully snag Kansas and Missouri to keep itself from being part of the other, smaller conferences left in the dust? Will the Big Twelve figure out a way to salvage itself with its own add-ons of BYU and TCU? Whatever the result, bring on the chaos!
Friday, June 11, 2010
10 Odd World Cup Stories
The Brazillian referees who will be reffing the USA v. England match have been studying English obscenities to be able to properly award yellow cards.
The Netherlands soccer team has been banned from using Twitter after one of its members posted an offensive video.
Spain has banned its players from going on facebook or twitter because the sites are too distracting.
France’s sports minister is complaining that the French team is spending too much money on its hotel accomodations.
Argentina's Jonas Gutierrez fogot to pack any clothes for his trip to South Africa
Chile and England have forbidden their players from having sex during the World Cup. England has even installed video cameras to ensure that the WAGs (wives and girl-friends) keep their distance.
John Travolta danced in front of Australia’s team in an effort to wish them luck.
A London newspaper has reported that English striker Wayne Rooney looks like Shrek.
The announcers will likely have trouble pronouncing some of the names of the players: Klaas-Jan Huntelaar, Zdravko Kuzmanovic, Zlatan Ljubijankic, Sokratis Papastathopoulos.
Monday, June 7, 2010
Worst Time of the Year
All that being said here are 5 reasons why this summer will be better than most.
Confrence Realignment: Revival of the Rocky Mountain Conference?
By the end of this month the collegiate sporting landscape as we know it is going to be drastically different. The Pac 10 and the Big 10 are going to expand, and from the looks of it they are going to tear apart the Big 12. It seems that the Pac 10 has its eyes on Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, and either Colorado or Baylor. The Big 10 will snatch up Nebraska and Missouri. Its not quite clear how all of this will work out, but the rumors have gotten so strong that the Big 12 has issued an ultimatum to Nebraska and Missouri to either declare their loyalty to the Big 12 or get gone.
That’s why the MWC is buying its time. It doesn’t know how the landscape is going to play out. For instance, if the Big 12 really does get destroyed then the MWC doesn’t need to do anything to ensure that it becomes one of the major powers. However the MWC has indicated that it would be willing to add up to as many 6 new teams, meaning that it would likely go after the Big 12 left overs plus any WAC teams that it really wants.
My favorite theory, albeit rather unlikely, is the revival of the Rocky Mountain Conference. This conference would consist of the following rivals: Byu v. Utah; Tcu v. Boise State; Kansas v. Kansas State; Colorado v. Colorado State; and then two other schools likely UNLV and Air force. The most exciting thing about this set up is that as a new conference we could get out of the horrible agreement that we have with The Mountain and CBS. Also, think of what a basketball powerhouse we would become with the addition of Kansas and Kansas State.
In the end, it comes down to money not conference competitiveness. Oklahoma, Texas, Nebraska, and Missouri, make a lot of money and the Pac 10 and the Big 10 want a piece of that money. That’s why Boise State may get left out in the cold, they are a great football school but they cant bring in the dough. By Friday, when Nebraska and Missouri have to decide whether the bolt or to stay, things are going to either be a lot clearer or a lot more murky in the world of college sports. I personally am hoping for the later.
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
What ever happened to the NBA’s Flopping Fine?
The Spurs are officially going in to the second round and with that we have to endure another round of Manu Ginobli’s gut-renching flailing, flopping, and just overall ridiculousness. The Cavs are looking pretty good and you know what that means? Another month of Anderson Varejao getting constantly knocked down by the wind. And the Oscar goes to…..
Whenever possible I go right to the source, and this is certainly no exception. Here is what the highly credible (as far a whining goes) Rasheed Wallace said about flopping,
"They've got to know that he's a da** flopper That's all Turkododo do. Flopping shouldn't get you nowhere. He acts like I shot him. ... That's not basketball, man. That's not defense. That's garbage, what it is. I'm glad I don't have too much of it left."
Let me say right now that almost all players sell a foul a bit at times to get a call, but I’m talking about blatant falling down and over-dramatizing just to get a cheap call on another player.
'Memo to Stern' it’s time to stop policing what everyone is saying and Tweeting about and start fining these guys for flopping. The hard part of fining a player for flopping it is so hard to tell if they did actually flop. In clear cases where a player blatantly throws himself to the ground according to the NBA rules a fine is in order. The NBA would then basically turn into the Academy Awards fining those who couldn’t sell their foul as well as others.
If the NBA didn’t think they could determine a flop why did they make the rule? So this basically comes down to the fact that the NBA and its fans were sick of floppers and wanted to do something about it. So, the NBA decided to just threat players with a fine and see if anything would change. Not surprisingly a hollow threat has not changed anything.
If you need any further examples just watch a Cavs or Spurs game. I would hate to have a few lame floppers help determine the outcome of a series.
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Mock Draft 2.0
#1 – Rams – Sam Bradford QB – Sam Bradford may not be the best player in the draft but the Rams desperately need someone to take over for Bulger. Furthermore, Rams management needs an excuse to keep their jobs. Drafting a defensive tackle wont buy enough job security.
Sunday, April 11, 2010
How the West Was Won
The One Seed: Lakers
Lakers
The Lakers are the only team in the West whose playoffs seeding is secure. But they are still playing for prides sake. They have been losing right and left. They desperately need to find an identity before the playoffs.
Best: 58 wins - 1st
Worst: 56 wins - 1st
Tough games: no one
Prediction: 58 wins - 1st
The Three way Tie:
My predictions put Dallas, Utah, and Denver all tied at 54 games each. The tie-breakers for 3 teams first looks at whether the teams won their conference. Dallas and Denver will both have won theirs which would bump Utah to 4th place. Next we look at all three teams and their win loss records against each other. Dallas would come out on top.
Dallas
Dallas is in an interesting position. They are actually pulling for Denver to win out. Assuming Denver wins out they get the 2 seed. However if Dallas and the Jazz are tied at 54 and Denver loses a game, then the Jazz own the tie breaker over Dallas and would get the 2 seed. Given that Pop-a-zit has stated on a scale to 1-10 he wants his desire to play the Lakers in the first round is a negative 5, I think the Spurs win.
Best: 55 wins – 2nd
Worst: 53 wins – 5th
Tough games: Spurs
Prediction: 54 wins – 2nd
Denver
I think that Denver will beat the Suns. Frankly I don’t have much confidence in the Suns at all. Denver however has to be careful about an at home trap game against a decent Memphis team. The hardest thing for the Thuggets is going to be able to stay motivated without their ring leader and inspiring coach.
Best: 54 wins – 2nd
Worst: 52 wins – 5th
Tough Games: Phoenix
Prediction: 54 wins - 3rd
Utah
Perhaps my roommates have been spiking the koolaid but I think that the Jazz will win out. The Suns are a scary offensive team, but Utah is an even scarier home team. Boozer and Williams are in a rhythm and look to be near unstoppable offensively. As a Laker fan I am hoping that the Lakers can somehow work their way into 2nd or 3rd or lose their remaining games where they would lose a tie breaker with Oklahoma city. I don’t want to see them in the second round.
Best 54 wins -2nd
Worst 52 wins – 6th
Tough Games: Phoenix
Prediction: 54 wins – 4th
The Overrated: Phoenix
Phoenix
As you might have gathered by now I don’t have confidence in the Suns. They don’t play defense, they are not big, and I just don’t think they are very good. I predict them winning just one more game.
Best: 54 wins -2nd
Worst: 51 wins – 7th
Tough Games: Denver, Jazz, Rockets
Prediction: 52 wins – 5th
The 3 Teams Trying to Avoid the Lakers
Oklahoma city
I love watching this team play. Westbrook and Durant are simply amazing. Durant will overtake Lebron as the best pure scorer in the game. I think they beat the Blazers and win out. Unfortunately I think they are too young to go very far in the playoffs.
Best: 52 wins - 4th
Worst: 49 wins – 8th
Prediction: Blazers
Prediction: 52 wins – 6th
San Antonio
San Antonio has been getting a lot of hype recently. It’s true they have playoff experience, and they have one of the best coaches in the game. Nonetheless, they are about a bjillion years old. But, I still think they win out, they simply will have more to play for than Dallas.
Best: 51 wins -5th
Worst: 49 wins - 8th
Tough Games: Dallas
Prediction: 51 wins - 7th
Portland
Portland might be better than I think. Truth be told I haven’t seen them play much this year. They will be a scary good team if Oden can stay healthy. I also think that the Thunder pose too many matchup problems for the Portland. I think they will get 8th. (I originally had them losing to the Lakers but moments ago the Lakers collapsed under pressure.)
Best: 51 wins - 6th
Worst: 49 wins - 8th
Tough Games: Lakers, Thunder
Prediction: 50 wins -8th